Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Race Face ERA Crank Arms, No BB, 136 BB, 160mm, BlackReimagined carbon crank is 300% stronger than Next R cranks Patent pending insert redesign means loose inserts are a thing of the past Steel wear plate improves durability Versatile Cinch system offers interchangeable spiders, limitless ring combinations, swappable width 30mm alloy spindles, and full compatibility across all relevant frame standards 136mm wide spindle: 52mm chainline on bikes with Boost 148mm rear spacing (optional: use Shimano 12sp
- Reimagined carbon crank is 300% stronger than Next-R cranks- Patent pending insert redesign means loose inserts are a thing of the past
- Steel wear plate improves durability
- Versatile Cinch system offers interchangeable spiders, limitless ring combinations, swappable width 30mm alloy spindles, and full compatibility across all relevant frame standards
- 136mm wide spindle: 52mm chainline on bikes with Boost 148mm rear spacing (optional: use Shimano 12sp ring for 55mm chainline with 136mm spindle)
- *BB sold separately, use RF291* for English 68/73mm, BB92 or PF30 BBs
- BB spanner sold separately, use RF2997
- Chainrings and spiders sold separately
- Designed, tested and manufactured in Race Face's Canadian facility
- 176mm Q-factor
- 475g (170mm)
Today's Stock Status
4 Available to ship in 2-4 Business Days
UPC: 821973493602
EAN: Not available
Manufacturer Part Number: Does Not Apply
RF0750 CK1453
180364-Q0-L
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 1449 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 2
Not for chewers
Color: Black
This is cute, but my golden retriever destroyed it in 5 minutes.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Not the best for sharp puppy teeth
Color: Black
Very cute, however my 12lb puppy ripped one of the corners off within the first week. He likes to chew but has not ripped any other toy yet
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Size matters to my Chihuahua 😂
Color: Black+Grey
Finally, 4th times the charm, I bought similar remotes from 3 other Amazon listings and they were all 1/2 inch bigger than in the photos or description, and from one's I bought for my Chihuahua last year, he wouldn't touch them! As soon as I gave these to him, he quickly grabbed them and started playing with them. They're about the same size as a real fire stick, which is his obsession. Will buy more to stock up for him!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Sturdy rope
Size: Medium (23.60")
Very sturdy rope. My dog is a heavy chewer and this rope is perfect for her.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2026
★★★★★ 5
This is the one for my dog, (and maybe yours)
Size: Medium (23.60")
Great dog toy! Got the larger size— less accidental hand bites that way. It’s our second one, but the pup is a strong chewer so no disappointments with the product at all. Many breeds would not do what mine did to the rope. I love that it’s natural cotton. The longer version that I ordered comes with 3 knots, including one near each end— great— and one in the middle, which I don’t like or need. It’s a tad difficult to untie the central knot, but it’s possible with a screw driver or awl, and then it’s a perfect toy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2025